|
Memorandum to Clients
December 2008
Vol. XVIII No. 12
LEGISLATIVE UPDAT: PART IV:
RINGING IN THE NEW YEAR
As Florida community
associations approach the new year with annual members= meetings, officers
and directors report greater concerns resulting from the 2008 legislative
session. As of January 1, 2009 a community association management firm
employed by a Florida condominium or homeowners= association governing
more than 10 units, or with a budget of $100,000 or more, must be licensed
by Florida= s Department of Business and Professional Regulation.
The bulk of the remaining
issues arise concerning condominium associations because the most
significant homeowners= association legislation, House Bill 679, was
vetoed. Thus, for now, as a clarification and correction, homeowners=
associations are not required to undertake candidate certification nor
staggered term votes. Florida condominium associations scheduling and
planning for their 2009 annual members= meetings must consider many new
provisions, including the following well before their meetings:
Staggered Terms. If a
condominium association= s by-laws permit staggered terms of no more
than two years, even if the staggered term provisions were adopted by
a vote of members, then to continue staggered term elections, a
majority of the condominium association= s total voting interests must
approve staggered terms on or after October 1, 2008.
Candidacy. In addition
to self nomination, a candidate for election to a condominium
association= s board of directors must provide the association a
signed certification form. The form states that the candidate A has
read and understands, to the best of his or her ability, the governing
documents of the Association and the provisions of this chapter and
any applicable rules.@ While the nomination deadline is forty days
before a scheduled election, the certification must be received by the
Association no less than thirty-five days before the election, the
same deadline for a candidate to provide a candidate information
sheet. The Association is to deliver each candidate= s form to each
unit owner with the first notice of meeting.
Building Inspection
Report. Within five years beginning October 1, 2008 a condominium
association= s board of directors is responsible to have each
condominium building greater than three stories in height inspected. A
report based upon the inspection is to be provided under the seal of
an architect or engineer which is authorized to practice in the State
of Florida. The report must attest to required maintenance, useful
life and replacement cost of the common elements.
A majority of a
condominium association= s voting interests may waive this building
inspection report requirement. The waiver undoubtedly was incorporated
into the law because of the anticipated expense of the inspection and
report. An informal survey has indicated that few commercial buildings
undertake this process unless there is a sale or significant
reconstruction; thus, many condominium association directors have
questioned whether undertaking the report is reasonable.
If a condominium
association desires to waive the building inspection report
requirement, then the association must approve that waiver before the
end of the five year period beginning October 1, 2008. To avoid
missing deadlines, condominium associations that do not plan to
undertake the reports generally should undertake the waiver vote now
rather than wait until the A proverbial@ last minute. Note that a
waiver is valid only for one, five year reporting period.
Financial Reporting.
Financial reporting requirements may be waived for no more than three
consecutive years. Thus, at least every fourth year a condominium
association must undertake full financial reporting as required by
statute. If a financial reporting waiver is sought, then the waiver
must occur during the fiscal year reported, or the year before. A vote
does not waive financial reporting requirements for longer than two
years.
Homeowners= associations
are warned that in the 2009 legislative session, requirements similar to
those noted above for condominium associations will be considered. If you
do not desire to undergo the expense for these items, then it is
imperative that you contact your state legislators now.
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR v.
AGENT: WHEN IS AN EMPLOYER LIABLE?
Whether a Florida
association can be held liable for the negligence of a worker frequently
boils down to the question of whether the worker is an independent
contractor or is an agent.
A Florida appellate court
recently ruled that the question of whether an agency or independent
contractor relationship exists must normally be decided at a trial,
frequently a time consuming and expensive proposition. In Del Pilar v. DHL
Global Customer Solutions, Inc., DHL was sued for damages when a van used
to deliver DHL packages, but not owned by DHL, collided with the
plaintiff= s car. The trial court concluded in a summary proceeding that
the driver was an independent contractor; thus, DHL could not be held
liable for the van driver= s negligence.
The appellate
court noted that although a principal is not liable for the actions of an
independent contractor, a principal is normally liable for the negligence
of its agent. The appellate court held that the question of whether the
driver was an independent contractor should normally be determined by a
jury at trial, not by a judge using a summary procedure. To help
businesses avoid this question from arising, the court pointed out several
elements of control that suggest when a principal can be vicariously
liable for an agent= s negligence, including requirements that the agent:
(1) use the principal= s logo; (2) is prohibited from working on behalf of
competitors; (3) use only equipment selected pursuant to the principal= s
specifications; and (4) submit to inspections conducted at the principal=
s discretion.
Florida associations will
find this decision important because the decision provides guidelines to
help determine whether the association is working with an agent or an
independent contractor, especially since a mere label or title is not
conclusive. The extent of the right to control a worker will normally
determine if there is an agency or an independent contractor relationship,
and thus potential liability.
HAPPY HOLIDAYS!
The firm= s offices will
be closed on Thursday, December 25, 2008 and Friday, December 26, 2008 in
observation of national holidays. The firm= s offices will also be closed
the afternoon of Friday, December 12, 2008.
This information is provided for general information
purposes only, and may not be relied upon and is provided without
obligation or fee. It is distributed to the firm's association clients to
provide a general comment of recent legal changes. This information is not
legal advice, representation counsel or opinion. The changes in the law
may not have been reviewed by Florida courts and may be subject to further
challenge. Before taking any action you are urged to consult with counsel
to ensure that your legal rights are protected. 8
2008 by Gelfand & Arpe, P.A.
|