|
April 2004
MEMORANDUM TO CLIENTS
EMPLOYMENT ISSUES
Many community associations directly hire employees
while other associations use employment agencies or management companies.
In either instance associations must be cognizant of employment issues.
Two recent appellate court decisions provide guidance to Florida
employers.
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION: WHEN FOUL LANGUAGE GOES
TOO FAR
What happens if an employee "curses out" his or her boss? Can
you fire the employee and avoid an unemployment claim? It depends on who
hears the profanity. In the first of two decisions, Paeden v.
Unemployment Appeals Commission, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D462 (Fla. 5th
DCA, February 20, 2004), an appellate court ruled that cursing a
supervisor in front of other employees constituted misconduct barring
recovery of unemployment compensation benefits.
An employee of an Orlando cab company was fired after becoming abusive
and using foul language toward her supervisors during a counseling session
and calling one supervisor a vulgar name in front of other employees. The
Unemployment Appeals Commission found the employee was discharged for
misconduct and thus, disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits.
The appellate court agreed with the finding. The court pointed out that
under §443.101(1)(a), Florida Statutes (2003), misconduct
is defined as "conduct demonstrating willful or wanton disregard of
an employer’s interests and found to be a deliberate violation or
disregard of the standards of behavior which the employer has a right to
expect of his or her employee."
The court noted that a single curse word directed toward a supervisor
but not in front of other employees may not constitute misconduct. A court
looks at whether the employee had an audience. "Such behavior tends
to undermine the authority and respect for the employer, supervisor, or
leader of an organization, and its overall morale, to such an extent that
it cannot be tolerated - like mutiny on the high seas," the court
said. "Discharge or termination should be expected and it is serious
enough to disqualify a fired employee from receiving unemployment
compensation."
DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION: A SLIGHT LIMP IS NOT A
DISABILITY
When can an employee claim he or she has been
discriminated against because of a disability? Does a slight limp or
temporary condition count as a disability? Not every impairment makes one
disabled.
In the second appellate decision, Wimberly v.
Securities Technology Group, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D421 (Fla. 4th
DCA, February 18, 2004), the court ruled an employee who had a slight limp
and moved slower than he previously moved did not have a disability under
the Florida Civil Rights Act. Wimberly filed a disability discrimination
action alleging he had a physical impairment that limited a major life
activity - his walking. However, Wimberly was still able to perform his
job.
Florida courts construe cases under the Florida Civil
Rights Act the same as cases under the ADA - the Federal Americans with
Disabilities Act. The appellate court explained the ADA defines disability
as "(A) A physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one
or more of the major life activities of such individual; (B) a record of
such impairment; or (C) being regarded as having such an impairment."
The court pointed out the United States Supreme Court
has determined that merely having an impairment is not enough to win a
discrimination case. A person must establish that the impairment limits a
major life activity. The appellate court explained for a disability there
must be a substantial limitation on a major life activity. In other words,
the person must be completely unable to perform the activity or
significantly restricted in performing the activity. The court looks at
the following factors: (1) the nature and severity of the impairment; (2)
the duration or expected duration of the impairment; and (3) the permanent
or long term impact from the impairment.
The appellate court explained that Wimberly must have
had an injury that "substantially" limited his ability to walk
and stand. "An impairment’s minor interference in major life
activities does not qualify as a disability," the court said. The
court found that Wimberly’s slight limp did not rise to the level of a
disability under the ADA.
Because associations are also employers, it is
important to recognize that an association can not discriminate on the
basis of a disability. That being said, not every impairment will be
considered a disability. To avoid potential problems, contact your
association’s counsel if you have any questions.
CABLE CONTRACTS: WHAT IS EXPECTED MAY NOT BE WHAT
YOU GET
It was a battle of titans in which mere citizens were
the losers. EchoStar Communications, a satellite broadcaster, was reported
to be in dispute with Viacom, a network broadcaster. The dispute
highlighted some risks an association may unwittingly take when entering
into a contract with cable providers. EchoStar temporarily pulled from its
service some of Viacom’s stations, including CBS, MTV, Nickelodeon and
Comedy Central. Not a laughing matter for many people!
Most associations assume that the cable or satellite
stations will never change. But if the stations do change, most people
assume the association will be entitled to a credit or to cancel their
contract. Guess again. Most contracts do not provide for credits or
cancellation. It is important that you carefully review all contracts with
cable providers to know what you are really getting when you sign up for a
service.
FIRM NEWS
The firm is pleased to announce the addition of Brian
Sherwin to our support staff. Brian will be assisting attorneys concerning
pre-litigation assessment issues. Brian has five years collections
experience. Next time you call the office or come in, say hello to Brian.
|
This information is provided for public information
purposes only and is provided without obligation or fee. It is
distributed to the firm's association clients to provide a general
notice of recent legal changes. This information is not to be
considered as legal advice. The changes in the law may not have been
reviewed by Florida courts and may be subject to further challenge.
Before taking any action you are urged to consult with counsel to
ensure that your legal rights are protected.
© 2004 by Gelfand & Arpe, P.A.
|
|